Vex and the Country Essay #1 — Writing About Not (Or For Naught)

Recently, in a conversation with a friend, I expressed my sincere
disappointment in not feeling like writing anymore, hoping to find some
magical inspiration. Her response was – why not write about why you
haven’t been writing? An excellent suggestion!
Reading and writing have always been important in my life, both
personally and professionally. As a biologist who is keenly passionate
about conservation, I invest lots of time into researching and compiling
factual information and varying viewpoints on complex, often
controversial issues. I try to present them in thoughtful, accurate
manners that are interesting to read. These topics are typically not
difficult to understand when presented as such, but usually they are
quite challenging to condense.
But, frustratingly enough, except for a small core of dedicated friends
(whose support I truly appreciate) who often read my articles, what are
the typical responses? Scrolling on by in favor of viewing mindless, brief
content instead. Complaining anything over a few hundred words is too
long. Telling me I’m wasting my time preaching to the converted.
With the absolute most aggravating being – people who do read and
completely dismiss it all, feeling their opinions, based upon ignorance,
are worth more than any knowledge and facts I’ve assembled and
presented. Choosing instead to embrace overdramatization and
misinformation presented in crowd-stirring ways, that rouse the rabble
of all keyboard rebels who are instant “experts” on the subject,
claiming to “save” wildlife, via one damaging falsehood after another.
The resulting online hoopla quickly rots into a festering, toxic brew of
horribly ugly and potentially quite damaging proportions. An
intolerable display of intolerance and manufactured hatred. Poisonous
situations to protect yourself from.

So why bother trying to write factual yet heartfelt pieces? It ends up
feeling like when you need to scream in a dream, but the sound just
isn’t coming out. Mental constipation settles in. A backup of the flow
of the prose. A feeling that you’re just so tired of everyone else’s -
well, you know what – that you don’t even feel like expressing your
own pent up thoughts anymore. A desire to just quit and let those
seemingly hellbent on ruining everything get on with finally doing it.
But a writer’s gotta write, even if only for themselves. Even if there’s
only a shimmer of a glimmer of hope that someone else might want to
read it and relate to it. Especially when the topics are critical to the
well-being of that writer’s heart and soul.
About the time my friend suggested this topic to me, I found myself
distracted in the mindless scrolling on social media that I so
hypocritically dislike. Short video clips from the TV series Sex and the
City began catching my attention. I’m not a city person at all. Yet what
was it about that show that appealed to me?
Its characters represented a sampling of people in a certain
environment (one quite foreign to me) openly discussing topics that
many people likely ponder but are uncomfortable voicing. Most
viewers could relate to at least some parts of the characters’
viewpoints or challenges, including many they might not have
previously considered, as their own lives may have been vastly
different. Same but different, though, as there are universal threads
that unite all of us in certain ways. And each episode had the main
character, Carrie, ultimately writing thought-provoking essays in
personable ways that made you want to stop and think a bit, for better
or for worse.
In stark contrast, the city is not my habitat at all. I live, work, and
recreate in rural areas, and I travel to remote wildlands around the
globe. My focus in all of these activities is always on nature. And how
we, as humans, impact it. As well as how it affects us. And when I’m
alone with my thoughts, trying to figure out how to share these
important issues in essays that might just maybe encourage others to
think more deeply and act more appropriately about them, I often end
up frustrated and daunted.
How could people who have little to no experience outdoors, beyond
cities, or amongst wildlife, feel justified in dictating what can or cannot
occur in the lives of those of us who do? And continually dispute,
contest, and agitate us in problematic ways that honestly hurt
conservation instead of helping it?
Hence the creation now of my new blog series, titled Vex and the
Country. To vex someone is to annoy, puzzle or frustrate them. To be
problematic or contentious, difficult or much debated. Sometimes in
trivial ways. I’m often vexed, in the country, by people, who are often
(but not always) in the city, and their non-factual opinions nowadays on
topics that can be inherently vexing anyway.
I hope you’ll enjoy reading my candid essays in this new series. But I
hope more so that they’ll generate honestly deeper thought about the
topics presented, greater discussion amongst all of us, a desire to seek
the truth and reject the falsehoods, and an appreciation for
acknowledging that the world of both humans and nature is a complex,
diverse place with many far-reaching connections.
